facebook vs twitter June 29th, 2009 by Nikola
there are many channels for content distribution and each requires some adjusting - not all content can go through all channels. i will use an example of facebook and twitter to quickly show some basic differences between these two within the context of content production and distribution.

facebook is a community site, people register and post news on their walls, they have friends, belong to groups, become fans of pages, upload photos… in essence twitter has some of these functions but is totally different.
facebook is focused on networks while twitter is focused on microblogging. facebook is very much about being networked and being part of a network, while twitter is about quickly saying what you think and getting out.
on facebook tendency is towards organizing pages and groups and growing them through content and activities. focus on twitter is about having a publishing routine with some basic interactions. facebook offers a much larger variety of activities while twitter is minimal.
facebook is work, twitter is flash.
brands can get a lot out of both but each requires a very particular approach: facebook should be treated like a social club, twitter should be treated like smsing news to friends and sometimes replying to someones sms. at least this is how it seems to me today. i am sure that i understand these only partially because i only use them like this.
the point is that each is different, each requires a new approach which evolves all the time and therefore requires constant work and research and immersion into these environments.
be active with both and - like with any social media - learn it, get a feeling for it, experiment with it, get better at it.
each is a culture on its own with its own language, aesthetics and etiquette. it takes some time to relax with it and start getting solid results.
this goes for every social media or anything else brands do - as they say: devil is in details…








